| | 3 | |
| | 4 | === scantable issues === |
| | 5 | * most serious |
| | 6 | * polarization type - global: only one type per scantable - not real problem... |
| | 7 | * currently scantable assume some globals (NIF, etc) - but scantable intrinsically can handle... |
| | 8 | * difference in spw - IF: can be put in aux. table in MS? (SPECTRAL WINDOW table have 'freq group') |
| | 9 | * others |
| | 10 | * scanno renumbering - (mostly) reader issue |
| | 11 | * antenna dish diameter info gets lost - reader issue |
| | 12 | * POINTING sub-table truncation |
| | 13 | * weather info- reader issue |
| | 14 | * the issues presented can be resolved by exntend current scantable data format |
| | 15 | * data size?- even we copy some missing meta data, scantable probably be much smaller in size |
| | 16 | |
| | 17 | === To keep scantable === |
| | 18 | * direct MS->scantable filler + scantable -> MS filler (~3+1mon.) - Tekeshi |
| | 19 | * adding more meta-data in scantable |
| | 20 | * Malte and Takeshi will work on a new scantable format proposal (include more meta data) |
| | 21 | * plotter issue? |
| | 22 | * if we stay on scantable, we can still write out to MS to use plotms |
| | 23 | * still need to add SD specific functionality |
| | 24 | |
