| 20 | |
| 21 | (tentative) |
| 22 | |
| 23 | * Day 1: Overview |
| 24 | planning sessions for the rest of the meeting to set goals |
| 25 | |
| 26 | * Day 2 - ?: ASAP merge (alma branch -> trunk of ATNF ASAP svn) "working session(s)" |
| 27 | - Starting point would be alma branch updated recently by Kana |
| 28 | - include few more updates from CASA |
| 29 | - Resolve any conflicts, duplicated features, etc |
| 30 | - (move ASAP logger to CASA C++ logger?) |
| 31 | - Documentation (including scantable format description) |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | [Following sessions will be scheduled on ~last half of the second week] |
| 35 | |
| 36 | * Discussions(1): near term (~1yr?) ASAP coordination |
| 37 | - Future merge (alma branch->trunk) planning - how often? procedures |
| 38 | - consideration: release schedules of each packages |
| 39 | - Development plans (for CASA, CASS?) |
| 40 | - fillers? |
| 41 | - plotter |
| 42 | - flagging |
| 43 | - baseline fit improvement |
| 44 | |
| 45 | * Discussions(2): long term plan |
| 46 | - Possibility to unify ASAP - CASA as a single package to use for CASS/ALMA/.. |
| 47 | - Build issues? |
| 48 | - (supporting OSes) |
| 49 | - Scantable vs Measurement Set ("kick-off" discussion) |
| 50 | - Current usages of scantable |
| 51 | - Requirements for CASS/CASA |
| 52 | - Measurement Set def. 2.0 |
| 53 | - Is it sufficient to store single dish data from relevant telescopes (AT's, ALMA), do we need to modify? |
| 54 | - What modifications are needed for scantable to MS migration? |
| 55 | - Others |
| 56 | |