Replied: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 16:15:09 +1100 Replied: lstavele Replied: mkesteve Replied: Warwick.Wilson@atnf.CSIRO.AU Return-Path: Warwick.Wilson@atnf.CSIRO.AU Delivery-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:06:41 +1100 Return-Path: Warwick.Wilson@atnf.CSIRO.AU Received: from crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (crux.tip.CSIRO.AU [130.155.194.32]) by lynx.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0c) with ESMTP id NAA14304; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:06:40 +1100 (EST) From: Warwick.Wilson@atnf.CSIRO.AU Received: from acorn.atnf.csiro.au (acorn.atnf.CSIRO.AU [130.155.194.65]) by crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/TIPAT-1.0b) with SMTP id NAA04656; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:06:40 +1100 (EST) Received: by acorn.atnf.csiro.au (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3/yp/RP.2) id AA14631; Wed, 17 Mar 1999 12:04:49 +1000 Message-Id: <9903170204.AA14631@acorn.atnf.csiro.au> To: Mark.Calabretta@atnf.CSIRO.AU Cc: lstavele@atnf.CSIRO.AU, mkesteve@atnf.CSIRO.AU, wwilson@atnf.CSIRO.AU Subject: Re: REFBEAM, etc. Date: Wed, 17 Mar 99 12:04:42 +1000 X-Mts: smtp >I wasn't aware that sc_cal was used in this way! There's nothing about it in >the rpfits documentation. Well, you can believe me that it is. Whether it belongs in the rpfits documentation or the multibeam documentation is debatable. The format is: c SPECIAL FORMAT - for Multibeam at Parkes c c QUANTITY 1: 0 i.e. antenna number = 0 c QUANTITY 2: azimuth c QUANTITY 3: elevation c QUANTITY 4: parallactic angle c QUANTITY 5: focus_y c QUANTITY 6: focus_z c QUANTITY 7: focus_r c QUANTITY 8: temperature c QUANTITY 9: pressure c QUANTITY 10: humidity c QUANTITY 11: wind speed c QUANTITY 12: wind direction c QUANTITY 13-16: time of measurement of cal signals in Jy (ascii) c Added 17 March 1999 c QUANTITY 17: reference beam c There are also extra quantities written for each antenna: c c QUANTITY 15: Calibration signal size in Jy - pol A c QUANTITY 16: Calibration signal size in Jy - pol B c QUANTITY 17: Total power counts - cal off - pol A c QUANTITY 18: Total power counts - cal on - pol B c QUANTITY 19: Total power counts - cal off - pol A c QUANTITY 20: Total power counts - cal on - pol B c >Fine, except that SCANTYPE = "track" seems oxymoronic - "SCAN" is an >unfortunate choice of collective noun for integrations in single dish >observing. OK I'll change "SCANTYPE" to "OBSTYPE " - mjk's suggestion. >Could you put an expanded description of the two-letter codes >in the comment section of the card for human readers. I considered that, but 50 characters is not quite enough to cover the possible combinations. I'll look into whether I can put some useful information in the comment area. Cheers, Warwick. --------